Case 3302697/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Liam Jarvis v Masterselection Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302697/2021
- Decision date
- 25 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Liam Jarvis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 21 March 2022, Employment Judge Dick considered whether the claimant's breach of contract claim had a reasonable prospect of success. The claimant, Liam Jarvis, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Robert Barnsley, an employee of Masterselection Ltd. The judge recorded that the employment had ended on 25 September 2020 and that Mr Jarvis said he was not claiming notice pay.
The tribunal treated the claim as one for wrongful dismissal brought under the tribunal's contractual jurisdiction. It held that a contractual claim could not succeed for lost earnings beyond the contractual notice period, because an employer may terminate the contract for any reason subject to notice. The judge also held that the tribunal had no jurisdiction under Article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 to hear a claim for personal injury arising out of breach of contract.
The tribunal further held, relying on Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] ICR 480, that damages for injury to feelings or psychiatric injury caused by the dismissal or the manner of dismissal could not be awarded as damages for breach of contract. On that basis, the judge found that Mr Jarvis had suffered no actionable loss falling within the tribunal's contractual jurisdiction. The breach of contract claim was therefore struck out under Rule 37 for having no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant pursued a contractual claim for wrongful dismissal after his employment ended on 25 September 2020, but said at the hearing that he was not claiming notice pay. The tribunal held that damages for lost earnings beyond the notice period were not recoverable, and that injury to feelings or psychiatric injury could not be awarded as damages for breach of contract in the Employment Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37
- Article 3 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] ICR 480
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.