Case 3302728/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mohammed Infas Abdul JABBAR v 1 Huckleberry’s Chicken Limited 2 Fastfood Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302728/2021
- Decision date
- 8 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shrimplin Representation
- Venue
- Watford Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mohammed Infas Abdul JABBAR
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Watford Tribunal on 8 March 2022, Employment Judge Shrimplin upheld Mr Jabbar’s unfair dismissal claim against Huckleberry’s Chicken Limited. The judgment records that no ET3 response form had been presented by the respondent and that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination. The claimant was awarded a basic award of £2,690 and a compensatory award of £17,160.
The tribunal also found that Huckleberry’s Chicken Limited breached s86 Employment Rights Act 1996 because Mr Jabbar was not given notice and was not paid in lieu. It awarded £3,000 in respect of notice pay. Separately, the tribunal found a breach of the Working Time Regulations 1999 and awarded £3,360 in respect of holiday pay.
The claims against Fastfood Recruitment Limited were dismissed in their entirety.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld against Huckleberry’s Chicken Limited. The tribunal recorded that no ET3 response form was filed and that there was sufficient material to determine the claim. Claims against Fastfood Recruitment Limited were dismissed in their entirety. | Upheld | — | £19,850 |
| Breach of contract | Huckleberry’s Chicken Limited breached s86 Employment Rights Act 1996 because no notice was given and no payment in lieu was made. The award was for notice pay. Claims against Fastfood Recruitment Limited were dismissed in their entirety. | Upheld | — | £3,000 |
| Working time regulations | Huckleberry’s Chicken Limited breached the Working Time Regulations 1999 and the claimant was awarded holiday pay. Claims against Fastfood Recruitment Limited were dismissed in their entirety. | Upheld | — | £3,360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,210
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,690
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £17,160
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.