Case 3302740/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Hussain v Ultimate Finance Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302740/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 14 to 16 April 2021 before Employment Judge Quill sitting alone. Mr K Hussain appeared in person and Ultimate Finance Group Ltd was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent within the definition in section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded.
The claim was dismissed. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent within the definition in section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 95 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.