Case 3302740/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented For the v GXO Logistics UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302740/2023
- Decision date
- 6 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Cambridge on 6 September 2023, the Claimant did not attend and was not represented. Employment Judge Tynan recorded that the Claimant offered no explanation for his absence. The tribunal made three attempts to contact him using the BT meet-me facility and by telephone. It was satisfied that he had notice of the hearing because the notice had been sent to the email address he had provided on his claim form and used in correspondence on 27 April 2023.
The tribunal also noted that since July 2023 the Claimant had not engaged with the Tribunal or the Respondent, had not complied with orders to provide further information or a remedy statement, and had not completed the Agenda for Case Management sent on 17 July 2023. The Respondent said the Claimant had not replied to emails sent on 17 July, 11 August and 21 August 2023, and the tribunal found that since 17 April 2023 he had taken no action to pursue the claim. Having regard to Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, the tribunal concluded that it was just and equitable to dismiss the Claimant's complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not separately identify the underlying heads of claim in the reasons; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's complaints under Rule 47 following his non-attendance and lack of engagement. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify the underlying heads of claim in the reasons; this claim type is taken from the case listing context. The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's complaints under Rule 47 following his non-attendance and lack of engagement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.