Case 3302742/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S MURALIDHAR v Landmark Space Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302742/2023
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S MURALIDHAR
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 13 April 2023, the tribunal informed Ms S Muralidhar that it was considering striking out her unfair dismissal complaint because she appeared not to be entitled to bring that part of the claim, as she had been employed by Landmark Space Limited for less than two years. She was given an opportunity to make representations in writing or request a hearing on that issue.
Ms Muralidhar did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining claim or claims were still listed for hearing on 6 September 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 13 April 2023 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should proceed, on the basis that she was employed for less than two years. The claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.