Case 3302744/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Hemmings v Technical Laser Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302744/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Hemmings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 in the case of Mrs K Hemmings v Technical Laser Care Limited. It records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and orders the respondent to pay £2,500.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,448.00.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £4,338.21. The total amount recorded by the judgment is £9,286.21.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered payment of £2,500.00. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,448.00. | Upheld | — | £2,448 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £4,338.21. | Upheld | — | £4,338 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,286
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.