Case 3302749/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gerry Cunningham v Department for Work and Pensions — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302749/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Brady Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gerry Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Watford Employment Tribunal on 13 and 14 June 2022 before Employment Judge W Brady. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the complaint of unfair constructive dismissal was not well-founded. It states that this means the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment does not set out further findings or a remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair constructive dismissal was not well-founded and that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.