Case 3302770/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Greigg v Topkare Limited T/A Myhomecare — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302770/2020
- Decision date
- 2 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Greigg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 2 January 2020, the tribunal gave Mrs S Greigg an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment records that she failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. No merits determination was made, and the extracted text does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 for failure to actively pursue it. The extracted judgment does not break out separate findings on the underlying wage issue. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 for failure to actively pursue it. The extracted judgment does not contain separate merits findings on the working time issue. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.