Case 3302773/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Euroapi UK Ltd (formerly known as Genzyme Ltd) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3302773/2020
- Decision date
- 3 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment in the case of Kristina Mazeikiene v Euroapi UK Limited, heard remotely by CVP at Bury St Edmunds on 3 March 2022 before Employment Judge de Silva QC. The judgment records that the First Respondent’s correct new name is Euroapi UK Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant total compensation of £17,241.42. That sum was made up of financial compensation of £7,680 plus interest of £703.61, and compensation for injury to feelings of £7,500 plus interest of £1,357.81. The extracted text does not set out the earlier liability findings, but the remedy recorded is consistent with the race discrimination category listed for the case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Judgment on Remedy only. The extracted text records an award of compensation following an earlier liability decision, but does not repeat the underlying liability findings. | Upheld | Race | £17,241 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,241
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,680
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.