Case 3302777/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Mostafazadeh v South Eastern Interiors Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302777/2023
- Decision date
- 2 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Mostafazadeh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment. It recorded that section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years' employment or more before an employee has the right to a redundancy payment.
On the facts found, Mr A Mostafazadeh had been employed by South Eastern Interiors Ltd for less than two years. The tribunal therefore held that he did not have the right to a redundancy payment.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but he did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal accordingly struck out the redundancy payment claim. It stated that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the redundancy payment claim because the claimant had been employed for less than two years and had not given an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.155 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.