Mr Z Dicso v Swinton Aviation Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 3302785/2021
Decision date: 8 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Quill

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Z Dicso

Respondent

Swinton Aviation Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr Z Dicso against Swinton Aviation Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay £2,609.60 gross subject to PAYE.

The tribunal also awarded damages of £112.99 for breach of contract, described in the judgment as relating to returning costs and DBS. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,574. The total of the monetary awards set out in the judgment is £4,296.59.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Ordered as a gross sum of £2,609.60 subject to PAYE.	Upheld	—	£2,610
Breach of contract	Damages awarded in relation to returning costs and DBS.	Upheld	—	£113
Holiday pay	The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement.	Upheld	—	£1,574

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £4,297; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.