Case 3302802/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Latter v The Royal Latin School RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302802/2023
- Decision date
- 14 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Latter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 5 December 2023, Employment Judge Tynan, sitting alone, determined the issue of disability status under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that Ms A Latter was a disabled person during the relevant period, December 2021 to October 2022, by reason of anxiety, low mood and depression.
The tribunal did not accept that she was disabled by reason of complex PTSD, an eating disorder, and/or autism spectrum disorder. The record is limited to this preliminary issue and does not record any substantive findings on liability for the underlying discrimination claims or any remedy award.
The written record states that reasons given orally at the hearing will not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that, during December 2021 to October 2022, Ms A Latter was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of anxiety, low mood and depression, but not by reason of complex PTSD, an eating disorder and/or autism spectrum disorder. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.