Case 3302814/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Smith (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302814/2022
- Decision date
- 2 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cotton
- Venue
- Watford ET
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr P Smith (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford Employment Tribunal on 24 April 2023, Employment Judge Cotton, sitting alone, heard the respondent's application for an award of costs against the claimant under rule 76 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The application was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application for an award of costs against the claimant under rule 76 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 76 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.