Case 3302814/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302814/2024
- Decision date
- 17 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedIn person For the
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Tynan, sitting at Cambridge with the claimant in person and the respondent neither attending nor represented, found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages in early 2024, had failed to pay holiday entitlement, and had dismissed the claimant in breach of contractual notice.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and the judge ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £888.32. Total monetary orders were £3,849.36 gross for unauthorised deductions, £165.24 gross for holiday pay, £1,453.85 net damages for breach of notice, and the £888.32 basic award, giving a total of £6,356.77. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £3,849 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £165 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £1,454 |
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £888 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,357
- Basic award
- £888
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.