Claimant v Hewitt v Mrs A Auguste — 2025

Case reference: 3302821/2024
Decision date: 19 August 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Richard Wood
Venue: CVP

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Hewitt v Mrs A Auguste

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment is a short consent judgment. It records that, upon the agreement of both the claimant and the respondent, the tribunal entered judgment for unlawful deductions from wages. The claimant was Miss V Hewitt and the respondent was Mrs A Auguste.

The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £1,036.00. The judgment states that this sum is to be paid by the respondent to the claimant immediately. No further reasons, split of remedy, or additional claims are recorded in the extracted text.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment records that, upon the agreement of both parties, the tribunal entered judgment that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages in the sum of £1,036.00, payable immediately.	Upheld	—	£1,036

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,036; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.