Case 3302822/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I. Bahamin v Futurelink Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302822/2020
- Decision date
- 25 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I. Bahamin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Watford on 24 February 2021 before Employment Judge de Silva QC. The respondent attended by its director, Mr Adam Becker, and the claimant appeared in person. The judgment records that the hearing was remote by video and that a face-to-face hearing was not practicable.
The tribunal’s only substantive finding was that the Claimant’s claim was out of time. On that basis, the claim was dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not set out any further findings on the merits of the underlying complaint, and it does not record any separate remedy issues.
The judgment is brief and does not identify the substantive claim type(s) in the body of the decision. No award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text; it states only that the Claimant's claim was out of time and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.