Ms L Mullady v And Mr G Warburton — 2020

Case reference: 3302837/2020
Decision date: 9 September 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms L Mullady

Respondent

And Mr G Warburton

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Anstis determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had breached Ms L Mullady’s contract and ordered payment of £3,080 as compensation for breach of contract, described in the judgment as notice pay and stated to be a gross figure from which tax may be deducted.

The tribunal also found that Ms Mullady was entitled to a redundancy payment. It ordered Mr G Warburton to pay £4,620 in redundancy pay. The judgment does not set out any further findings, legal analysis, or separate apportionment of the two sums beyond those awards.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The tribunal found the respondent had breached the claimant’s contract and ordered £3,080 as compensation for breach of contract (notice pay), stated to be a gross figure from which tax may be deducted.	Upheld	—	£3,080
Redundancy	The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment and ordered the respondent to pay £4,620.	Upheld	—	£4,620

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £7,700; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.