Case 3302847/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Singh v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302847/2024
- Decision date
- 19 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Singh brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Royal Mail Group Limited. The matter was heard at Reading on 17, 18 and 19 November 2025 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. The claimant was represented by Mr E Carey of counsel; the respondent by Mr B Brown, solicitor.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered the respondent to pay the sum of £36,187.36. The award comprised a basic award of £12,596 and a compensatory award of £23,591.36.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided. The judgment was approved on 26 January 2026 and sent to the parties on 27 January 2026.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The respondent ordered to pay £36,187.36, comprising a basic award of £12,596 and a compensatory award of £23,591.36. | Upheld | — | £36,187 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36,187
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £12,596
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £23,591
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.