Case 3302857/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Triple Home Care Limited
On that basis, Employment Judge Ord found that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from her wages. The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £444.52.
- Case reference
- 3302857/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the Respondent, Triple Home Care Ltd, did not enter a response. On that basis, Employment Judge Ord found that Ms N Anderson had suffered unlawful deductions from her wages.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £444.52. The judgment does not break that sum down into separate remedy components and records no other award. There were no discrimination or dismissal findings in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment after the Respondent failed to enter a response; the Tribunal found the Claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of £444.52. | Upheld | — | £445 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £445
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.