Case 3302878/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Ponikowska v Laluna & the blue room — 2025
- Case reference
- 3302878/2024
- Decision date
- 3 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Ponikowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 3 April 2025 Employment Judge Hutchings ordered that Miss G Ponikowska's claim against Laluna & the blue room be struck out. The judgment gives no findings on the underlying merits of the dispute and records no monetary award.
The Tribunal's reasons say that, by a letter dated 29 January 2025, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated bases for possible strike out were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 July 2024 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. In those circumstances, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 10 July 2024 and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.