Case 3302902/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Total Solutions Group (London) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302902/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the linked claims 3302902/2020 and 3302911/2020, Employment Judge Smail recorded that the Respondent had failed to enter a response. The judgment therefore found the Claimant's claims of unauthorised deductions from earnings, holiday pay, and notice pay to be well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £992.80 net for unpaid pay covering 1 to 19 August 2019, £1,384.62 gross for 15 days accrued but untaken holiday, and £763.69 net notice pay. The total award was £3,141.11, payable forthwith.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 4 November 2020. No separate compensation components, interest, or other remedies were identified in the decision text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as £992.80 net in respect of unpaid pay for 1 to 19 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £993 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as £1,384.62 gross in respect of 15 days accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as £763.69 net notice pay. | Upheld | — | £764 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,141
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.