Case 3302905/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Total Solutions Group (London) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302905/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smail dealt with the case on 30 September 2020 after the respondent failed to enter a response. The tribunal held that Mrs L Schmitt's claims for unauthorised deductions from earnings, holiday pay and notice pay were well-founded.
The judgment made separate monetary awards for each element: £1,881.32 net for unpaid pay for August 2019, £1,507.68 gross for 14 days accrued but untaken holiday, and £1,881.32 net for notice pay. The tribunal stated that the total payable was £5,270.32, payable forthwith. Judgment was sent to the parties on 4 November 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as £1,881.32 net in respect of unpaid pay for August 2019; the judgment describes this as part of the claimant's unauthorised deductions from earnings claim. | Upheld | — | £1,881 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as £1,507.68 gross for 14 days accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £1,508 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as £1,881.32 net notice pay. | Upheld | — | £1,881 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,270
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.