Case 3302914/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gascoigne, claimant’s partner For the v Mr Ash Malik, Director — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302914/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gascoigne, claimant’s partner For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Molly Turner was employed by In-Home Carers Limited from 28 March 2019 to 1 December 2019. Her employment began on a zero-hours contract, and from 1 October 2019 she was promoted to Care Co-ordinator on a salaried basis. She brought a holiday pay claim after ACAS early conciliation, and the tribunal heard evidence from her and from Mr Ash Malik, sitting alone by CVP before Employment Judge M Warren.
For the holiday taken between 20 September 2019 and 6 October 2019, the tribunal found that Ms Turner had taken 11 days, equivalent to 2.2 weeks. On the basis of an average weekly pay of £315.88, calculated from 36.10 hours at £8.75 per hour, the value of that leave was £694.93. Because she had been paid £521.76, the tribunal held that £173.17 remained unpaid. It rejected any limitation defence, finding that payment was due at the end of October 2019 and that ACAS early conciliation stopped time running and extended the limitation period under regulation 30B and Luton Borough Council v Haque.
The tribunal also held that it was not correct to split Ms Turner’s employment between the zero-hours and salaried periods for the purpose of accrued holiday. Treating her employment as continuous, it found that she had accrued 18.66 days, rounded to 19 days, had taken 12 days, and therefore had 7 days of accrued but untaken leave at the end of employment. At a daily rate of £71.15, that produced £498.05. Ms Turner’s emails of 24 October, 7 November, 18 December and 24 December 2019 were treated as a grievance, the respondent did not deal with them, and the tribunal increased the award by 15% under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with the ACAS Code. The final award was £771.90 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant was owed holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. It awarded £173.17 for underpaid holiday taken between 20 September 2019 and 6 October 2019, plus £498.05 for 7 days of accrued but untaken holiday on termination. The ACAS uplift was applied separately to the overall holiday pay award. | Upheld | — | £671 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £772
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
11 references- Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulations 13 and 13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30B Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 221 to 224 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Luton Borough Council v Haque [2018] UKEAT/0180/17
- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.