Case 3302919/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Fysh v Carter Accommodation Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302919/2020
- Decision date
- 3 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Fysh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 26 October 2020 before Employment Judge Laidler. Mr Fysh did not attend and was not represented. The respondent attended through its Managing Director and HR Manager.
The tribunal recorded that the claims had been received out of time and therefore dismissed them. It also said that, even if time had not been a bar, the claims would in any event have been dismissed because the claimant had failed to actively pursue them. No merits findings or monetary award were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was received out of time; the tribunal also said it would in any event have been dismissed because the claimant failed to actively pursue it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed because the claim was received out of time; the tribunal also said it would in any event have been dismissed because the claimant failed to actively pursue it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.