Case 3302962/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr U Gurung v Totskey Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302962/2021
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr U Gurung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Anstis. The tribunal found that Mr U Gurung had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,776.00.
The tribunal also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,994.00. In addition, it held that the respondent had failed to pay his holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,070.00.
The total sum awarded was £9,840.00, made up of the three amounts set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,776.00. | Upheld | — | £1,776 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,994.00. | Upheld | — | £5,994 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,070.00. | Upheld | — | £2,070 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,840
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.