In person For the v Respondent — 2025

Case reference: 3302967/2024
Decision date: 16 March 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge French Appearances

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At the hearing on 28 February 2025, Employment Judge French heard the claim by video at Watford. The written judgment states that the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit.

The tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the primary time limit, but it also found that the claim was not presented within a further reasonable period. On that basis, the claim was dismissed.

No remedy was awarded. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The written judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. The case was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time, but it was also not presented within a further reasonable period.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.