Case 3302979/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Swift (in person) For the v Ms Page (solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3302979/2023
- Decision date
- 31 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Swift (in person) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case on 11 and 12 January 2024 at Cambridge Tribunal before Employment Judge Cowen. The claimant, Mr Swift, appeared in person and the respondent, Openreach Limited, was represented by Ms Page, solicitor.
The judgment records that, for the reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing, the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim did not succeed and was dismissed. The extracted written reasons do not include the tribunal’s substantive findings, factual reasoning, or any remedy award.
No discrimination, whistleblowing, wages, or contractual claims are recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no monetary award is stated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states only that, for the reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing, the unfair dismissal claim did not succeed and was dismissed. No further reasoning or remedy is set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.