Case 3302988/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Carrington-Coles v Barista Lounge — 2020
- Case reference
- 3302988/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Carrington-Coles
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response to the claim, so the tribunal entered judgment in the Claimant's favour under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The only claim recorded in the judgment was unauthorised deduction from wages, brought by Miss P Carrington-Coles against Barista Lounge.
The tribunal found that the Claimant was owed unpaid wages. It therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim and ordered the Respondent to pay £323.40 to the Claimant as compensation. No separate findings, split awards, or additional remedies were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal found the Claimant was owed unpaid wages and awarded £323.40. | Upheld | — | £323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £323
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £323
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.