Case 3302989/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Terence Briggs v Cook's Delight (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3302989/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Terence Briggs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the respondent, Cook's Delight (in voluntary liquidation), made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was also in breach of contract. The tribunal therefore upheld both the unlawful deduction of wages and breach of contract claims brought by Terence Briggs.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,431.88. The record does not split that figure between the two successful claims, so the award is treated as a single net payment on the judgment as written.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages; the judgment awards a single net sum and does not apportion it between this claim and the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract; the judgment awards a single net sum and does not apportion it between this claim and the unlawful deduction of wages claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,432
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.