Case 3302992/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3302992/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss Daniella G Piccione, was employed by Layla’s Lengths Limited from 12 September 2020 until 6 February 2023. The tribunal recorded that she was dismissed by text message and later by email. The respondent did not attend the hearing and there was no representation for it, so the claimant’s evidence was accepted.
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It accepted her evidence about the events of 5 and 6 February 2023, including the agreement for a half day on 6 February, the exchange about access to the premises, the later telephone argument, and the dismissal later that day. On that basis, the claim for unfair dismissal succeeded.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £862 and a compensatory award of £3,560, calculated as 12 weeks’ pay less two weeks’ pay in lieu of notice. The tribunal found that the claimant had worked for two months part time in a tanning salon while looking for work and later found work in July, and it assessed loss by reference to 10 weeks at her previous weekly pay of £356.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid her week in hand and awarded £356 for that item. The claims for unpaid holiday pay and unpaid pension contributions had been paid and were dismissed on withdrawal. The total award payable was £4,778.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 6 February 2023 after a text message dismissal later confirmed by email. The award comprised a basic award of £862 and a compensatory award of £3,560. | Upheld | — | £4,422 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid her week 'lying on' and awarded £356. | Upheld | — | £356 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal after payment had been made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The unpaid pension claim was dismissed on withdrawal after payment had been made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,778
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £862
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,560
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.