Case 3303005/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Matthews v Dennis Bozier Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303005/2020
- Decision date
- 21 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Matthews
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment determined on the documents without a hearing. The claimant presented a valid claim on 8 March 2020. The respondent filed a response saying the claim was not defended. The claimant later clarified in correspondence that he only wished to pursue redundancy pay and holiday pay.
The tribunal accepted from the claim form that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that his statutory redundancy payment had been correctly calculated at £7,637.50. It therefore made an award for that amount. The tribunal also accepted that the claimant was owed holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay £780.
The claimant had also raised notice pay and what he described as loss of consultation pay. In later correspondence he unequivocally withdrew any other complaints, including the notice pay point and any complaint that dismissal occurred without a contractually required procedure. The judgment records that there was no unfair dismissal complaint in the claim form, and says that if there had been, that would also have been withdrawn. The hearing listed for 23 July 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,637.50. | Upheld | — | £7,638 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £780. | Upheld | — | £780 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew any claim for notice pay and any allegation that dismissal occurred without a required contractual procedure. The judgment records that any breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,418
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.