Case 3303010/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Guy Parsons v Parker Hannifin Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303010/2024
- Decision date
- 15 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge Civil Justice Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Guy Parsons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Guy Parsons' claim against Parker Hannifin Limited at Cambridge Civil Justice Centre on 14 and 15 November 2024, before Regional Employment Judge Foxwell. The only claim identified in the judgment is unfair dismissal.
The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. No written reasons are set out in the extracted text, because the reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons would only be provided if requested in accordance with the note on the judgment form.
No compensation or other remedy is recorded in the judgment text. The extracted record therefore shows a single dismissed unfair dismissal complaint, with no monetary award listed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and is dismissed. No written reasons are provided in the extracted text because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.