Case 3303013/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Craig v Artificial Solutions UK Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303013/2021
- Decision date
- 2 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 21. The tribunal recorded that the claims for redundancy payment, arrears of pay, holiday pay and notice pay were dismissed upon withdrawal. It also recorded that a separate protective award claim was unaffected by this judgment and was the subject of separate orders.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal stated that there was no basic award because the claimant had already received a redundancy payment. It then assessed compensation by taking account of the schedule of loss and the likelihood that the claimant would have been dismissed at the end of a fair procedure.
The tribunal said the compensatory award included £500 for loss of statutory rights plus around four weeks' net pay and pension contributions, and ordered the respondent to pay £2,275 as compensation for unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to this as a claim for arrears of pay and says it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as a notice pay claim and says it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal said there was no basic award because the claimant had received a redundancy payment, and it assessed compensation by reference to loss of statutory rights and about four weeks' net pay and pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,275 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,275
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,275
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.