Case 3303014/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Acton v Evolution Corporate Acquisitions Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303014/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Acton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Foxwell Date determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £52,082.50.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £9,578. No separate findings, reductions, or interest were recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no split between the two sums was provided beyond the distinct orders made on each head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £52,083 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9,578 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £61,661
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.