Case 3303024/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lane v NRJ Developments Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303024/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Lane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, so the Employment Tribunal entered judgment under rule 21. On the papers, Employment Judge Hawksworth found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £435.84.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £305.09. The judgment states that the complaints of unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, and failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment and itemised payslips were left to be decided at a later hearing, so they were not determined in this rule 21 judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £435.84. | Upheld | — | £436 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £305.09. | Upheld | — | £305 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £741
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.