Case 3303031/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Szkopkowska v ECO Cleaning Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303031/2020
- Decision date
- 13 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Szkopkowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response, so judgment was entered for the claimant under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment states that the claimant was owed wages and holiday pay.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £263.92 in compensation and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. The judgment does not split the award between the unpaid wages and holiday pay elements, and it records no other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant was owed wages; the monetary award was not split between the wage and holiday pay heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claimant was owed holiday pay; the monetary award was not split between the wage and holiday pay heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £264
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £264
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.