Case 3303036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303036/2020
- Decision date
- 24 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment heard at Watford on 23 February 2021 before Employment Judge de Silva. The Respondent admitted liability for unlawful deduction from wages and unfair dismissal, so the Tribunal did not determine liability issues in this written record. It ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £1,446.40 net for unlawful deductions from wages.
For unfair dismissal, the Tribunal ordered a basic award of £2,100.00 and a compensatory award of £4,042.00 net. The Respondent’s application for costs was refused. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Respondent admitted liability for unlawful deduction from wages. The Tribunal ordered payment of £1,446.40 net. | Upheld | — | £1,446 |
| Unfair dismissal | The Respondent admitted liability for unfair dismissal. The Tribunal ordered a basic award of £2,100.00 and a compensatory award of £4,042.00 net. | Upheld | — | £6,142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,588
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,100
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,042
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.