Case 3303037/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Badejo v Securitas Security Services (UK) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303037/2020
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Badejo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unlawful deduction of wages against Securitas Security Services (UK) Ltd. The hearing was held remotely by Cloud Video Platform at Norwich on 8 January 2021 before Employment Judge Postle.
The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by in-house counsel. The tribunal dismissed the unlawful deduction of wages claims, stating that the claimant was clearly no longer actively pursuing them in light of the non-attendance at the full merits hearing.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record stated that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the claims of unlawful deduction of wages were dismissed because the claimant was no longer actively pursuing them, given non-attendance at the full merits hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.