Case 3303046/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Urbanowicz v To & Do Services Limited (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303046/2021
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Urbanowicz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M Urbanowicz brought a claim against To & Do Services Limited (in liquidation) for unpaid wages. The respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal found that the claimant was a worker within section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore had jurisdiction to hear the wages claim.
The claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,239.48 in total.
That sum was made up of £933.00 for unauthorised deductions from wages for the period worked between 27 September 2021 and 21 November 2021, and £306.48 for wages due for the days worked in the week commencing 22 November 2021 that were not paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was a worker within section 230(3) ERA 1996 and that the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,239 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,239
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 230(3) ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.