Case 3303054/2023 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v SLM Rescue Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303054/2023
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hunt Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr B Lloyd’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. No attendance is recorded for either party, and the written judgment states that the tribunal considered the evidence, statements and submissions from the parties before reaching its decision.
The judgment records an award of £1,600, with credit to be given for any wages already paid. It specifically notes £424.08 alleged to have been paid by the respondent, which would leave £1,175.92 outstanding. The short record does not set out further reasoning or split the award into separate components.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and awards £1,600, but also directs that credit be given for wages already paid, notably £424.08 allegedly paid by the respondent, leaving £1,175.92 outstanding. | Upheld | — | £1,176 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,176
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.