Case 3303072/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr J Bitran, Director of Bitran Group Ltd trading as J & J Security — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303072/2021
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Horn, brought claims including unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, notice pay or wrongful dismissal, redundancy pay, and accrued unpaid holiday against J & J Security. The case was heard at Watford on 4 and 5 July 2022 before Employment Judge G D Davison. The tribunal stated that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The notice pay or wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claim for accrued unpaid holiday was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.