Case 3303077/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S. Biss attended without a representative For the v Colour Marketing Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303077/2024
- Decision date
- 22 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Hunt Appearances
- Venue
- Bury Saint Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S. Biss attended without a representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S. Biss brought claims against Colour Marketing Services Limited for unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. The hearing took place at Bury Saint Edmunds on 9 September 2025 before Employment Judge M. Hunt. Mr Biss attended without a representative and there was no attendance for the respondent.
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim brought contrary to Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also dismissed the wrongful dismissal claim. In each case the written record states that the claim was not well-founded.
The judgment record does not set out the tribunal's reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also records that written reasons will not be provided unless a request is made within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties on 22 September 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim brought contrary to Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996; dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.