Case 3303082/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Philips v Seymours Snape Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303082/2021
- Decision date
- 2 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Philips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge T Brown sitting alone at Bury St Edmunds by Cloud Video Platform on 2 March 2022. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was not present or represented, with the record noting that no response was presented. The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages, was wrongfully dismissed, and was unfairly dismissed, and it also declared that the reason for dismissal was redundancy.
The tribunal ordered payment of £1,636.05 for arrears of pay covering 10 September 2020 to 15 March 2021, £264.23 for unpaid notice pay, a redundancy payment of £2,148.18, a compensatory award of £335.00, and £626.92 for leave accrued but untaken at the termination of employment. The written record states that reasons were given orally on 2 March 2022 and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay for the period 10 September 2020 to 15 March 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,636 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Award for unpaid notice pay. | Upheld | — | £264 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal declared the dismissal unfair and awarded a compensatory award of £335.00. | Upheld | — | £335 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal declared that the reason for dismissal was redundancy and ordered payment of a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,148 |
| Holiday pay | Leave accrued but untaken at the termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £627 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,010
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £335
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.