Case 3303085/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Walker v Anglian Windows Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303085/2021
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill KC
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr A. Scott, Ms K. Turquoise
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A. Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Watford on 14, 15 and 16 September 2022, the tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge McNeill KC with lay members Mr A. Scott and Ms K. Turquoise, heard Ms A. Walker's claims against Anglian Windows Ltd. The written judgment records that Ms Walker appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim as not well-founded. It also dismissed her claim that she was subjected to detriment on the ground that she had made a protected disclosure.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, noting instead that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided on a timely written request. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the claim was for detriment on the ground that the claimant had made a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.