Case 3303088/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Barnes v Travel And Financial Services Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303088/2021
- Decision date
- 30 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough REPRESENTATION
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Barnes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for a protective award against Travel and Financial Services Limited (in Compulsory Liquidation) and the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
The Tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit the protective award claim within the time limit prescribed by section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It also found that the claimant submitted the claim within a reasonable further period, and directed that the claim would continue.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment, which addressed the time limit issue only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim. The judgment decided only that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within the section 189 TULRCA 1992 time limit and that it was presented within a reasonable further period, so the claim would continue. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable further period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.