Case 3303090/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Myers(counsel) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303090/2020
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Members
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- Mr A Schooler, Mrs A Carvell
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Myers(counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 20 September 2021 before Employment Judge King sitting with Mr A Schooler and Mrs A Carvell, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s unfair dismissal claim and discrimination claim were dismissed upon withdrawal. The written judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability or the underlying facts, and no merits decision is given.
The tribunal did not award any remedy. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal; the written text does not specify the protected characteristic, but the case listing identifies it as disability discrimination. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.