Case 3303099/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Temba v And 1 4PX Express (UK) Ltd 2 First Recruitment Limited Held by CVP and hybrid on 25 May and 8 November 2021 — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303099/2020
- Decision date
- 8 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein Statement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Temba
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was conducted by CVP in hybrid form on 25 May and 8 November 2021 before Employment Judge Kurrein. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the Claimant's claims because they were presented out of time. On the age discrimination claim, the tribunal was not satisfied on the balance of probabilities that it would be just and equitable to extend time.
The tribunal also found, again on the balance of probabilities, that it was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to have presented his other claims within the primary limitation period. As a result, all of the Claimant's claims were struck out. The judgment records no liability finding and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to these collectively as 'other claims'; this claim label is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment refers to these collectively as 'other claims'; this claim label is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to these collectively as 'other claims'; this claim label is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers to these collectively as 'other claims'; this claim label is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- just and equitable to extend time
- not reasonably practicable
- balance of probabilities
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.