Case 3303106/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bukowski Mr S Rozewki Mr P Wolski Mrs K Bielaszewska v Winep 66 Limited In Administration — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303106/2020
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Bukowski Mr S Rozewki Mr P Wolski Mrs K Bielaszewska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the respondent had failed to comply with the requirement in section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. On that basis, the claim for a protective award succeeded.
The award was made in respect of all claimants, who were said to have worked at the respondent’s establishment at 2 Lodge Way, Lodge Farm Industrial Estate, Northampton and to have been dismissed as redundant on or after 11 December 2019. The protected period was fixed as beginning on 11 December 2019 and lasting for 90 days.
The judgment records that the Recoupment Regulations apply. It also states that any other claims brought by the claimants remain stayed under paragraph 43(6) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. No separate monetary sum is set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found a failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award for the claimants. The protected period began on 11 December 2019 and lasted 90 days. The extracted text does not state a separate monetary figure for the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- paragraph 43(6) of Schedule B1 Insolvency Act 1986
- Recoupment Regulations
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.