Case 3303133/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303133/2024
- Decision date
- 17 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 28 January 2025 before Employment Judge French, with Mr J Peltak appearing in person and Mr B Jones, Counsel, appearing for the respondent. The tribunal amended the respondent’s name from Serco Group Plc to Serco Limited, finding that this was the correct legal entity and the claimant’s employer.
The only claim recorded in the written judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out the tribunal’s reasons beyond that formal outcome.
The judgment note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.