Case 3303149/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Byrom v King Arthur Inns Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303149/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Byrom
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr J Byrom's claim against King Arthur Inns Ltd. It did so after a letter dated 7 February 2023 gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations to avoid that result, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Tynan ordered that the claim be struck out. No remedy was awarded and no substantive liability finding was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 7 February 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.